Show
Destroy
An entry
Get it down. Make it good. Share it.
Title
Text
Compiled some notes after our call. Did I miss out anything? Coherence between multiple levels of “resolution” in product development Mapping out systems / processes in order to understand reality at different resolutions 3D gives a different dimension. You can “zoom in” and “zoom out” of different levels of resolution, a la Google Maps If the dimensions are not defined, then it’s not a map, but a diagram Using blockchain as a common data layer for productivity apps to live on top Maps can be made independent of the underlying data One reason for incoherence is how information is stored in a dozen different apps, or in video calls, whiteboards, post-its, etc – not integrated. Copy and paste doesn’t actually “copy”; references between information aren’t preserved. How do we educate people to think fluently in systems? Possible reason: People are afraid to be wrong One possible way: Disarm people through child-like play. It’s okay to be wrong! As long as there are guardrails Systems thinking / product development as a video game Bret Victor’s UI is playful and is almost like a video game Decision making coach / linter Can help consultants, senior practitioners, but also executives, frame their thinking
Status
idea
draft
release
personal
Series
Part of a Series?
Bitcoin
On Work
Phoenix Trello Tutorial
Civics
Re Email Address
Tags
notes
×
systems design
×
+
Slug
Url
Image 1
Image 2
Image 3
Visible
Date